Cases 41 - 50 of 73
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Moody et al
as 5:2013fj00002
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant:
Mark B. Moody, David L. Osburn, John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Spine and Sports Chiropractic, Inc. v. Zirmed, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Spine and Sports Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Zirmed, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griffin v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
David Griffin
Defendant:
Charles A. Jones , Sarah C. Jones , CA Jones Management Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hawkins v. County of Lincoln et al
as 5:2012mc00215
Plaintiff:
Kara Hawkins
Defendant:
County of Lincoln, John Doe(s) and Great Plains Regional Medical Center
Michael Frederick Paving Corporation et al v. Tommy Abbott and Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2012fj00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Frederick Paving Corporation
Defendant:
Tommy Abbott and Associates, Inc., Edmund Scarborough and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
