Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Ronald Johnson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4064
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD G. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Thomas DiBiaseIn re: Thomas DiBiase
as 19-3946
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS C. DIBIASE
Walter Martinez v. Christopher LaRose, et al
as 19-3908
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of DHS, REBECCA ADDUCCI, in her official capacity as Director, ICE Field Office, WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
WALTER MELARA MARTINEZ
Ronald Johnson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-3848
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD G. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER LAROSE
Reginald Everson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-3805
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD EVERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Channon v. LaRose
as 19-2147
Respondent / Appellee:
Brad LaRose, U.S. Marshals' Service
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew Channon
Ronald JohnsonIn re: Ronald Johnson
as 19-3607
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD G. JOHNSON
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER LAROSE
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Larry Obhof, et al
as 19-3551
Petitioner / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, KATHRYN DEITSCH and others
Defendant:
FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of the State of Ohio, LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives and LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate
Janero Mitchell v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-3546
Petitioner / Appellant:
JANERO MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Dontay Taylor v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-3541
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONTAY A. TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
