Cases 41 - 48 of 48
BIRD v. MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.
as 2:2010cv01091
Plaintiff:
JOHN BIRD
Defendant:
MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
MOORE et al v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 3:2009cv04592
Plaintiff:
DERICK BRIAN MOORE and MICHELLE BUTZ
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
KATES v. MOORE, et al
as 2:2000cv02729
Respondent:
TERRY MOORE and JOHN FARMER
Petitioner:
EDWARD KATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. I.C. SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2009cv00242
Plaintiff:
DANNY MOORE, SR.
Defendant:
I.C. SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLS v. GERALD E. MOORE & ASSOCIATES, PC/WORLDWIDE ASSET PURCHASING LLC
as 2:2008cv03578
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MILLS
Defendant:
GERALD E. MOORE & ASSOCIATES, PC/WORLDWIDE ASSET PURCHASING LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE v. MOORE et al
as 2:2007cv01914
Plaintiff:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE
Defendant:
CORENDA MOORE, JAMES ARTHUR STONE, SR., SHATARA STONE and others
Cross Claimant:
JAMES ARTHUR STONE, SR. and JAMES ARTHUR STONE, SR.
Cross Defendant:
CORENDA MOORE, SHATARA STONE, CARLIN COLEMAN and others
Counter Claimant:
JAMES ARTHUR STONE, SR. and JAMES ARTHUR STONE, SR.
Counter Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
PARDY v. DUPUY et al
as 2:2007cv01385
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA PARDY
Defendant:
YVA DUPUY, YVA DUPUY, BENJAMIN MOORE & CO. and others
Counter Claimant:
ERNEST J. FOSSA, YVA DUPUY, BENJAMIN MOORE & CO. and others
Counter Defendant:
CYNTHIA PARDY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
