Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Trade Commission v. Hornbeam Special Situations, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03094
Defendant:
Earl G. Robinson, Keith Merrill, Mark Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Petitioner:
Guadlupe Leticia Gallegos Andrews
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
USA v. Robinson et al
as 5:2017cr00012
Defendant:
Christopher Wells, Joshua Beverly, Phillip Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Robinson v. Gilkey
as 1:2017mi00054
Plaintiff:
Kristina Theres Robinson
Defendant:
Shonda Gilkey
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Aaron's Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02270
Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge
Defendant:
Aaron's Inc. , John W. Robinson, III , Ryan K. Woodley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
State of Georgia, ex. rel. et al v. O'Dom et al
as 1:2017cv01808
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia, ex. rel. and Ralph T. Hudgens
Defendant:
Richard O'Dom , Key Insurance Network, Inc. , Key Claims Services Corporation and others
Movant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cross_claimant:
Clifford Olsen
Cross_defendant:
Ashton J. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
