Cases 41 - 50 of 67
LIBERTY BELL BANK v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2013cv07148
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY BELL BANK
Defendant:
LUIS G. ROGERS and LEASE GROUP RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CAUMMISAR et al v. ARSENAL CAPITAL PARTNERS et al
as 3:2013cv06878
Plaintiff:
EARL STANLEY CAUMMISAR, JR. , KELLY MCBRYDE , WARREN COLEMAN POWELL and others
Defendant:
ARSENAL CAPITAL PARTNERS and TRACTMANAGER HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LEGION PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv06809
Plaintiff:
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
LEGION PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC , BRADLEY VIZI , CHRISTOPHER KIPER and others
Counter_claimant:
LEGION PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC , ROGER BALLOU , BRADLEY VIZI and others
Counter_defendant:
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MCCRAY v. UNITE HERE et al
as 1:2013cv06540
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MCCRAY
Defendant:
UNITE HERE, UNITE HERE GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD, UNITE HERE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ROGER v. MORRICE et al
as 1:2012cv07910
Plaintiff:
FRANCES ROGERS
Defendant:
BRAD A. MORRICE, GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROGERS v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2012cv05655
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE ROGERS
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
AMBOY BANCORPORATION et al v. PINE HILL PARTNERS, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2012cv03631
Plaintiff:
AMBOY BANCORPORATION , FOXMOOR DEVELOPMENT, INC. , FOXMOOR AT WOODCREST FIELDS, CORP. and others
Defendant:
PINE HILL PARTNERS, L.L.C. , LEONARD I. SOLONDZ , ROGER GORE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
