Cases 41 - 50 of 305
Campos v. Lavinsky et al
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Joseph Campos
Defendant:
Roger Lavinsky, David Jaroslawicz, Cartaflash Slattery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Owens et al v. Taliban
as 1:2022cv01949
Defendant:
Taliban and Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Plaintiff:
James Owens, Estate of Betty Owens Evely, Gary Robert Owens and others
Not Classified By Court:
Christine O'Neil
Interested Party:
Anne Wodenshek, Sarah Wodenshek, Haley Wodenshek and others
Garnishee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Raul v. Rogers Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Malka Raul
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Bruce D. Hoechner, Keith L. Barnes and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chaidez v. Communications Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07155
Plaintiff:
Allen Chaidez
Defendant:
Communications Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Steven C. Webster and others
Parshall v. Rogers Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11095
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Bruce D. Hoechner, Peter C. Wallace and others
Woods v. Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07109
Plaintiff:
Matthew Woods
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Bruce D. Hoechner, Keith L. Barnes and others
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Ciccotelli v. Rogers Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10723
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Bruce D. Hoechner, Keith L. Barnes and others
Rivera v. Communication Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10637
Plaintiff:
Bashir Rivera
Defendant:
Communication Systems, Inc., Roger H.D. Lacey, Steven C. Webster and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
