Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Hill-Cook v. Rose Mobile Homes, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Donna Kay Hill-Cook
Defendant:
Rose Mobile Homes, LLC , Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. and Smith & Yeager
Third_party_plaintiff:
Rose Mobile Homes, LLC
Third_party_defendant:
Smith & Yeager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2011mc00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harold F. Smith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
City of Canton, Mississippi et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
City of Canton, Mississippi , William Truly, Jr., Alice Scott and others
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Jim Hood
Intervenor:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Credit Collection Services
as 2:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Smith
Defendant:
Credit Collection Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Andrews v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
A.L. Boyd also known as Sonny doing business as B&B Dairy Farm, Jesse L. Andrews, Joe S. Andrews doing business as Andrews Dairy and others
Defendant:
Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., Dean Foods Company, National Dairy Holdings, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2011mc00005
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Bruce Smith, IV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
