Cases 41 - 50 of 52
**CASE MERGED** ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 10-20604 United States of America v. Sanchez-Alamilla
as 2:2010mj30400
Defendant:
Jose Sanchez-Alamilla
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Jose Sanchez-Alamilla
as 2:2010mj30400
Defendant:
Jose Sanchez-Alamilla
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Fernando Mejia-Sanchez
as 2:2010mj30343
Defendant:
Fernando Mejia-Sanchez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
**CASE MERGED** ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 10-20617 United States of America v. Mejia-Sanchez
as 2:2010mj30343
Defendant:
Fernando Mejia-Sanchez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Sanchez-Gomez
as 2:2010mj30247
Defendant:
Porfirio Sanchez-Gomez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Porfirio Sanchez-Gomez
as 2:2010mj30247
Defendant:
Porfirio Sanchez-Gomez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Ford Motor Company Speed Control Deactivation Switch Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2005md01718
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Iley, Marla K. Iley, Robert Nicholas Dill, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Karl Flammer Ford, Incorporated, Bill Currie Ford, Incorporated, Bill Currie Ford, Incorporated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Intervenor:
Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Orozco-Sanchez v. USA
as 2:2009cv14263
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Orozco-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Type:
Other Statutes
Sanchez v. Jonoshies
as 2:2009cv14244
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Sanchez
Defendant:
Daniel Jonoshies and Daniel Jonoshies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
United States of America v. Feliciano et al
as 2:2009cr20282
Defendant:
David Sanchez Feliciano
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
