Cases 41 - 50 of 315
Vander Sanden v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as WIE/2:17-cv-01410
Plaintiff:
John Vander Sanden
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics , Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Lewis v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as MIW/1:17-cv-01029
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. , Stryker Orthopaedics and Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Lewis
Emmett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as KYW/3:17-cv-00519
Plaintiff:
Jay F. Emmett
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Chapko v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopedics et al
as MIE/2:17-cv-13733
Plaintiff:
Carol P. Chapko
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopedics and Stryker Corporation
Megan Hupe v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv02319
Defendant:
Does and Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff:
Megan Hupe
LUSH v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
as DC/1:17-cv-01578
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LUSH
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION , STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER IRELAND LIMITED
Bolduc v. Stryker Corporation et al
as RI/1:17-cv-00429
Plaintiff:
Phillippe J. Bolduc
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
PPD Enterprises, LLC v. Mako Surgical Corporation et al
as 8:2017mc00112
Plaintiff:
PPD Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Mako Surgical Corporation , Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Movant:
Corin USA Limited, Co.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
KOLBOSKY v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION et al
as PAW/2:17-cv-01263
Plaintiff:
LOIS KOLBOSKY
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION , STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION
Cote v. Stryker Corporation et al
as RI/1:17-cv-00311
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cote
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
