Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Del Fuoco v. U.S. Department of the Army et al
as 8:2009cv00578
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Del Fuoco
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Army and Pete Geren
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAMSTACK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 1:2008cv00658
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PHILIP RAMSTACK
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOMEZ v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2007cv02014
Plaintiff:
JOVITA C. GOMEZ
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cannon, et al v. Gates, et al
as 07-4107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
F. DOUGLAS CANNON, MARGARET LOUISE CANNON and ALLAN ROBERT CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GATES, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
SE Fed Power Cust v. Harvey, Francis J., et al
as 06-5080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Army, Joseph W. Westphal, in his official capacity as the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Robert B. Flowers, Lt. General in his official capacity as the Commander, United States Army Corp of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
City of Gainsville, State of Georgia, Cobb County Marietta Water Authority and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Apalachicola Bay & Riverkeeper, Inc., Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
MARIN v. DOD, et al
as 1:1995cv02175
Plaintiff:
MELVIN M. MARIN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
