Cases 41 - 50 of 60
John Anesetti v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2014cv00383
Plaintiff:
John Anesetti
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2013cv01003
Plaintiff:
Inland Empire Waterkeeper
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
-E United Alloys Inc v. Baker, et al
as 2:1993cv04722
Defendant:
Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company The, Harold A Baker, Helen J Baker and others
Counter Claimant:
Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker and others
Unknown:
Peter M Roan, Peter M Roan, Peter M Roan and others
Cross Defendant:
Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker, Helen J Baker and others
Cross Claimant:
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Flask Chemical Corp, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co and others
Counter Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, Siskin Investment Co, United Alloys Inc and others
Special Master:
Hon Harry R McCue
Plaintiff:
United Alloys Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Asarco LLC v. Nustar Energy LP et al
as 3:2011cv01384
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Shore Terminals LLC, Nustar Energy LP and others
Plaintiff:
Asarco LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. City Of San Jose
as 5:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
City Of San Jose
Cause Of Action: Environmental Matters
Atchison Topeka, et al v. Brown & Bryant Inc, et al
as 1:1992cv05068
Plaintiff:
Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company , Southern Pacific and USA
Defendant:
Brown and Bryant Inc , John H Brown , Ed A Brown and others
Counter_claimant:
Brown and Bryant Inc , John H Brown , Ed A Brown and others
Counter_defendant:
Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company , Southern Pacific , Puregro Company and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Ed A Brown , John H Brown , Brown and Bryant Inc and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Shell Oil Company , Rhone-Poulenc Inc , Hercules Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
Puregro Company
Cross_defendant:
Brown and Bryant Inc , John H Brown , Ed A Brown and others
Claimant:
State Board of Equalization and Department of Toxic Substances Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2009cv01202
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
The City of Fullerton, Fullerton Redevelopment Agency and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
CA Dept Toxic Sub v. Brighton Oil Co, et al
as 2:2002cv00018
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Defendant:
Brighton Oil Co, Brighton-Bengal Oil Refining Co., Herbert S McDuffie, Jr and others
Counter_claimant:
R L Niello Inc , Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Tiechert Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control , Aerojet General Corp , Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Gordon Turner Motors Inc , Aerojet General Corp , Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Herbert S McDuffie, Jr , Christine E McDuffee , Charles V. Kester and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sacramento County and Aerojet General Corp
Thirdparty_defendant:
Union Oil Company of California , Atlantic Richfield , Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Federal Insurance Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2008cv03212
Defendant:
Does and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. CA Dept. of Transportation
as 2:2008cv02225
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Defendant:
California Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
