Cases 51 - 60 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Clark v. Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00692
Plaintiff:
Deborah Clark
Defendant:
Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
CS Business Systems, Inc. et al v. Schar et al
as 6:2017cv00364
Plaintiff:
CS Business Systems, Inc. , James L. Shelton , Virginia L. Shelton and others
Defendant:
Dwight C. Schar , Paul E. Simonson , DCS Investments Holdings GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
CS Business Systems, Inc. et al v. Schar et al
as 5:2017cv00086
Defendant:
The Ryan Law Group, LLC, DCS Real Estate Investments V, LLC, Paul E. Simonson and others
Plaintiff:
Won Y. Shin Trust, Brad Heckenberg, PJS Rental, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clarke v. Stofft
as 9:2017cv80123
Petitioner:
Adam Richard Clarke
Defendant:
Kinsley Elizabeth Stofft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wortley et al v. Bakst et al
as 1:2017cv20050
Plaintiff:
Babara Wortley , Richard I Clark , Liberty Properties at Trafford, LLC and others
Defendant:
Michael R Bakst and George Stevens Fender
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Proposed Findings of Fact and Concl. of Law
Clark v. Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01582
Plaintiff:
Deborah Clark
Defendant:
Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
