Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1025
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, doing business as National Grid USA and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: KeySpan-Ravenswood, LLC, NRG Power Marketing, Inc., Arthur Kill Power LLC and others
KeySpan Ravenswood L v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1332
Petitioner: KeySpan-Ravenswood, LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Long Island Power Authority and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. Bodman, Samuel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-5302
Plaintiff - Appellant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. and others
Defendant - Terminated Party: Spencer Abraham, Secretary of United States Department of Energy
Defendant - Appellee: Samuel W. Bodman, Secretary of United States Department of Energy and George B. Breznay, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals of the U.S Department of Energy
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 05-1509
Plaintiff-Appellant: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee: GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and SAMUEL W. BODMAN, SECRETARY OF ENERGY
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 05-1450
Plaintiff-Appellant: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 05-1442
Plaintiff-Appellant: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and others
Defendant-Appellee: GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and SAMUEL W. BODMAN, SECRETARY OF ENERGY
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. Bodman, Samuel W., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-5089
Plaintiff - Appellant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Long Island Lighting Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. and others
Defendant - Terminated Party: Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy, United States
Defendant - Appellee: Samuel W. Bodman, Secretary of Energy, United States and George B. Breznay, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals of U.S. Department of Energy
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 05-1309
Plaintiff-Appellant: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and others
Defendant/Cross Appellant: GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and SAMUEL W. BODMAN, SECRETARY OF ENERGY
CONSOLIDATED EDISON V ENERGY
as 04-1615
Plaintiff-Appellant: CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., FEDERAL PAPER BOARD COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee: GEORGE B. BREZNAY, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals and SAMUEL W. BODMAN, SECRETARY OF ENERGY
Natl Assn Regu Util, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-1148
Petitioner: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Terminated Party: Public Service Commission of South Carolina and Lincoln Electric System
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: PacifiCorp, Tucson Electric Power Company, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Southern California Edison Company, Southern Company Services, Inc., The Electric Power Supply Association and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Cottonwood Energy Company LP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?