Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Uong Lam v. EDI Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06430
Defendant:
Does and EDI Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Uong Lam
Sinofreight Logistics, Inc. v. Lighthouse Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05551
Defendant:
Does, Lighthouse Transportation Services, LLC and Yerevan Trucking Express, Inc
Plaintiff:
Sinofreight Logistics, Inc. and Sinofreight, LLC dba SB Freight
Guilherme Mitrovitch v. Ace Cash Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04083
Defendant:
Ace Cash Express, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Guilherme Mitrovitch
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Western Express Inc
as 2:2015mc00055
Petitioner:
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Western Express Inc
Great American Insurance Company, Inc., v. Megatrux, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv01866
Defendant:
88 Transportation Inc, 9 Expo, Inc, Adrian Trucking, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company, Inc
Great American Insurance Company, Inc., v. Megatrux, Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv06952
Defendant:
88 Transportation Inc, 9 Expo, Inc, Adrian Trucking, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company, Inc
Alostar Bank of Commerce et al v. Airnet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2014mc00060
Defendant:
Airnet Holdings, Inc., Airnet Management, Inc., Airnet Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alostar Bank of Commerce
Receiver:
Kevin O'Halloran
Anderson International Foods, Inc. v. England Logistics et al
as 2:2014mc00003
Defendant:
AGS Express: Garegin Smbatyan, England Logistics and Green Mile Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anderson International Foods, Inc.
Anderson International Foods, Inc. v. England Logistics et al
as 2:2014mc00004
Defendant:
AGS Express: Garegin Smbatyan, England Logistics and Green Mile Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anderson International Foods, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
