Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Pierre v. The Ingber law Firm PLCC et al
as 1:2016cv05974
Defendant:
Mr. Clifford Ingber, Ms. Sharon O. Simon and The Ingber law Firm PLCC
Plaintiff:
Jean Gespere Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pierre v. Law Firm Littler Mendelson P.C. et al
as 1:2016cv04364
Defendant:
Craig R. Benson, Hema Chatlani and Law Firm Littler Mendelson P.C.
Plaintiff:
Jean Gespere Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Umoh v. The Borland Law Firm, LLC
as 1:2016cv00900
Plaintiff:
Nsikak Umoh
Defendant:
The Borland Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kaul v. Christopher J. Christe, Esq. et al
as 1:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Christopher J. Christe, Esq., State of New Jerey, Jeffrey Chiesa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sassone v. The Levinbook Law Firm, P.C.
as 2:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ashley J. Sassone
Defendant:
The Levinbook Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ward v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2015cv06803
Defendant:
Child Center of New York, Communication Workers of America, Judge Lenora Gerald and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Ward, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Borland Law Firm, LLC et al v. Revaz Chachanshvili Law Group, PLLC et al
as 1:2015mc02217
Plaintiff:
Brett Borland and Borland Law Firm, LLC
Defendant:
Revaz Chachanshvili Law Group, PLLC and Yaakov Shotkin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Brand et al
as 2:2015mc00826
Appellee:
Craig A. Brand and The Brand Law Firm, P.A.
Appellant:
Harold D. Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
