Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FABICS et al v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS et al
as 3:2014cv02202
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FABICS, PAUL DEAN, MOSES WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS, TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS, SOUTH BRUNSWICK AND ITS AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GAGE v. MILLER et al
as 3:2013cv06985
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
THOMAS C. MILLER and JENNIFER M. PEREZ, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WWRD US, LLC et al v. MILLER
as 2:2013cv03258
Plaintiff:
WWRD US, LLC and KPS CAPITAL PARTNERS LP
Defendant:
IRA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07091
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HUDSON RIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC, METROPOLITAN CONSOM, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04727
Plaintiff:
Prudence Lise Miller and Philip E. Wolfson
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
