Other Statutes Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 61 - 70 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00957
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re Daniel Alan Niehaus
as 2:2017mc00016
Respondent: Daniel Alan Niehaus
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Meros v. Dimon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00103
Defendant: Dimon, Redman, Nasser Youssef and others
Plaintiff: Meros and Thomas L Meros, r
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Katz v. Green et al
as 1:2016cv02905
Plaintiff: Norman Katz
Defendant: Daniel Green, Alex Husted, David J.R. Milliner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01083
Plaintiff: DaNiel Rogers
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Manley, Deas & Kochalski, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace et al v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2016cv00899
Defendant: Daniel B. Baldwin and Steve Abdella
Plaintiff: Suzanne L Wallace and Jacqueline L Wallace
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Henshaw v. EN Realty Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00460
Plaintiff: Daniel Henshaw
Defendant: EN Realty Group Inc. , Victor Naar and Castlerock Realty Group LLC
Counter_claimant: Castlerock Realty Group LLC
Counter_defendant: Daniel Henshaw
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Richardson v. Law Offices of Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00554
Plaintiff: Homer L. Richardson
Defendant: Law Offices of Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C., Meredith E. Unger and William Sung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: Daniel Karl Balaloski
as 2:2016mc00004
Respondent: Daniel Karl Balaloski

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?