Other Statutes Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 61 - 70 of 128
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Moody et al
as 5:2013fj00002
Plaintiff: National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant: Mark B. Moody, David L. Osburn, John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00288
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cline et al v. Sears Holding Management Corporation et al
as 1:2013mc00002
Plaintiff: Sabrina Cline and Collette Delbridge
Defendant: Sears Holding Management Corporation and Does 1 through 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Spine and Sports Chiropractic, Inc. v. Zirmed, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00489
Plaintiff: Spine and Sports Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant: Zirmed, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00121
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?