Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Mario Rubin v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 2:2009cv06727
Petitioner:
Mario Rubin
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell Wayne Funk v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 2:2009cv06753
Petitioner:
Russell Wayne Funk
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fontaine v. Uribe, Jr.
as 2:2009cv06603
Petitioner:
Marcos Richard Fontaine
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald Davin v. USDCLA, et al
as 09-72900
:
In re: REGINALD VAL DAVIN
Petitioner:
REGINALD VAL DAVIN
Respondent:
USDC, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Robert Eugene Robinson v. Domingo Uribe
as 5:2009cv01723
Petitioner:
Robert Eugene Robinson
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Troy Malray v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 2:2009cv06560
Petitioner:
Christopher Troy Malray
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Everett Toy v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 2:2009cv06539
Petitioner:
Everett Toy
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Cedric Howard Jackson v. Domingo Uribe Jr
as 8:2009cv01035
Petitioner:
Cedric Howard Jackson
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warees Beyah v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 2:2009cv06144
Petitioner:
Warees Beyah
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darryl Dotson v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 2:2009cv06115
Petitioner:
Darryl Dotson
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
