Cases 61 - 70 of 183
Abdallah v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv07342
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , Thomas M Cioppa , John F Kerry and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Abdallah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Tian v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv03478
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Zhi Keng Tian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nasser v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv06294
Plaintiff:
Hamdan Nasser
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , James B. Comey, Jr. , Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
LI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv02731
Plaintiff:
RONG LI
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, MICHAEL BORGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Palmero v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05760
Plaintiff:
Ana Palmero
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , Thomas M Cioppa and James B. Comey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2016cv05759
Plaintiff:
Ana Palermo and Jeh Charles Johnson
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jr. and Thomas Cioppa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Type:
Other Statutes
Ristik v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05762
Plaintiff:
Ilija Ristik
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , James B. Comey, Jr. and Thomas M Cioppa
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Zhu v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv02679
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Yong Mei Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abuarab v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05480
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Abuarab
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson , James B. Comey, Jr. and Thomas M Cioppa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Sager et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05402
Plaintiff:
Jason Sager and Ana Maria Darie
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Leon Rodriguez , Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
