Cases 61 - 70 of 266
Wimberly v. automotive Mastermind, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01870
Defendant:
Christina Bouchot, Jane and John Doe, Eric Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Wimberly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Iacovacci v. Brevet Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv08048
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 Through 100, Johnny Lan, Brevet Short Duration Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Iacovacci
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
DISH Network, LLC et al v. Kaczmarek et al
as 1:2019cv04803
Plaintiff:
NagraStar LLC and DISH Network, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN or JANE DOES 1-10, Tomasz Kaczmarek, Julia Defoe and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
City of New York v. Cigarettes Unlimited, L.C. et al
as 1:2019cv03998
Plaintiff:
City of New York
Defendant:
Robert A. Schmidt, Cigarettes Unlimited, L.C., Mary Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kaikov v. Kaikov et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
SHIRYAK, BOWMAN, ANDERSON, GILL & KADOCHNIKOV LLP, ROYAL A&K REALTY GROUP INC., AG REALTY BRONX CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
CHALAMO KAIKOV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv03854
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv03380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
