Cases 61 - 70 of 175
Jose Medina Soto v. Dean Borders
as 5:2017cv01606
Respondent:
Dean Borders
Petitioner:
Jose Medina Soto
Teresa Dominguez et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv04557
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does and Eden Medina
Plaintiff:
Teresa Dominguez and Jesus Romero Garcia
Marcus Medina et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2017cv01195
Defendant:
Mayra Bernal, County of San Bernardino, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Medina and Brittni Nishimura
Erika Sepulveda et al v. City of Whittier et al
as 2:2017cv04457
Plaintiff:
Maria Carmen Sarate Angeles, E. P., M. P. and others
Defendant:
Officer Cabral, City of Whittier, DFC Global Corp. and others
Adrian Moon et al v. Kimberly Seibel et al
as 5:2016cv00009
Defendant:
H Aguliar, H Aguliar, Al B Allal and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Medina, Adrian Moon and Johnny Potter
Hayden et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv06208
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hayden and Dario Medina
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re:Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
as 2:2015ml02639
In Re:
Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tjaden, John Assalian, Enrique Barrios and others
Petitioner:
Showtime Networks Inc., Attorney Edgardo Lopez, Mr. Maximino Lopez and others
Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions LLC, EMMANUEL D. PACQUAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David P. Gomez et al v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06227
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Comcast Corportion, DIRECTV Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David P Gomez, Peter Gomez, Robert Martinez and others
Medina Cordova v. R & R Fresh Fruits and Vegetables of California, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ana Lucia Medina Cordova
Defendant:
R & R Fresh Fruits and Vegetables of California, Inc. and Chris Lizaola
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
