Cases 61 - 70 of 138
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. ProMED Healthcare Management Services, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02669
Plaintiff:
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC
Defendant:
ProMED Healthcare Management Services, LLC, Rapid Financial Services, LLC, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grutsch v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. c/o CSC -Lawyers Incorporating Service
as 2:2015cv02583
Plaintiff:
Richard L Grutsch
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. c/o CSC -Lawyers Incorporating Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nikolovski et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02350
Plaintiff:
Kire Nikolovski and Tatjana Nikolovski
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Yates v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 1:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Yates
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanna et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv00709
Plaintiff:
William L. Hanna and Cynthia G. Hanna
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leavitt et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 1:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Leavitt and Denise E Leavitt
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
