Cases 61 - 70 of 259
Stein v. Tiffany & Co. et al
as 1:2019cv11926
Defendant:
Rose Marie Bravo, Roger N. Farah, Abby F. Kohnstamm and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Younge v. Aircastle Limited et al
as 1:2019cv11574
Defendant:
Takayuki Sakakida, Ronald L. Merriman, Ronald W. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
David Younge
The Estate of Michael Heiser et al v. Clearstream Banking, S.A.
as 1:2019cv11114
Petitioner:
Anthony W. Cartrette, Michael Morgera, The Estate of Earl F. Cartrette, Jr. and others
Respondent:
Clearstream Banking, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ExteNet Systems, Inc. v. Village of Lake Success et al
as 2:2019cv03471
Plaintiff:
ExteNet Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Lake Success Village Board of Trustees and Village of Lake Success
Intervenor Defendant:
Jennifer Kim, Eileen Sarnoff, Geoffrey Mazel and others
Not Classified By Court:
Michael A. Levy
Abraham Produce Corp. v. MBS Brothers Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02638
Plaintiff:
Abraham Produce Corp.
Defendant:
Young Chul Ahn and MBS Brothers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Denker-Youngs v. Denker-Youngs et al
as 1:2019cv01609
Defendant:
Edward John Denker-Youngs, E. John Youngs, Edward Youngs and others
Plaintiff:
Brian H. Denker-Youngs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
