Cases 71 - 80 of 166
Perez v. Liberty Gas Station and Convenience Store, LLC
as 5:2016mc00050
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Liberty Gas Station and Convenience Store, LLC
Perez v. Servicemaster Cleaning and Restoration by AMS et al
as 2:2016mc02100
Respondent:
Frank Catalano
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Servicemaster Cleaning and Restoration by AMS
Perez v. Wild Fusion 1, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc00265
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Wild Fusion 1, Inc., Wild Fusion 2, Inc. and Li Bin Xiao
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Aleutian Capital Partners LLC v. Perez et al
as 1:2016cv05149
Plaintiff:
Aleutian Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas E Perez, United States Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Agenjo v. City Of New York ; et al
as 1:2015cv07461
Plaintiff:
David Agenjo
Defendant:
City Of New York ;, Police Officer Amaurys Taverez, Shield #019400, Police Officer Martires Perez, Shield # 011767 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hon. Thomas E. Perez v. York Metal Toll Processing, Inc.
as 5:2016mc00013
Plaintiff:
Hon. Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
York Metal Toll Processing, Inc.
Davis v. New York State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2016cv01750
Plaintiff:
Evan A. Davis
Defendant:
New York State Board of Elections , Peter S. Kosinski , Douglas A. Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Perforated Screen Surfaces, Inc.
as 3:2016mc00011
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Perforated Screen Surfaces, Inc.
P.T. Thomas, Inc. et al v. Perez et al
as 1:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
P.T. Thomas, Inc. and Nadi Ganesan Viswanathan
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez and ALC Certification Officer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perez v. Northeast Landscape & Masonry Associates, Inc. et al
as 7:2016mc00050
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Northeast Landscape & Masonry Associates, Inc. and Anthony Pergola
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
