Cases 71 - 80 of 118
Poulos v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01923
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Poulos
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. , John T. Chambers , Randy Pond and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Poulos v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv01923
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Poulos
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. , John T. Chambers , Randy Pond and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cinotto v. Bartz et al
as 4:2011cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Cinotto
Defendant:
Carol Bartz , M. Michele Burns , Michael D. Capellas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cinotto v. Bartz et al
as 5:2011cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Cinotto
Defendant:
Carol Bartz , M. Michele Burns , Michael D. Capellas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
F.G. Crosthwaite et al v. River View Construction Inc.
as 3:2011cv00965
Plaintiff:
F.G. Crosthwaite , Russell E. Burns , Operating Engineers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
River View Construction Inc.
Gerald Hoffarth et al v. Diversified Lending Group Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00336
Defendant:
Applied Equities Inc, Ray Arevalo, Cindy Baltimore and others
Plaintiff:
Sachiko Araki, Tadashi Araki, Tadshi Araki and others
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, San Diego County Public Defender, C-SPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Larry Allen Burns , Skomal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruben Talamantes v. Ray Leyva et al
as 2:2004cv06792
Defendant:
Aguilar, Lee Baca, Kenneth J Brazile and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Talamantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
