Cases 71 - 80 of 200
Melvin Hanes v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:20-CV-00289
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hanes and Lillie Cottrell
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Lane Nakasone and others
Frankie v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:20-CV-00291
Plaintiff:
Frankie and Tammy Frankie
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Petitioner:
Eric F. Robinson
Respondent:
J. Pickett
Regan Phillips v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:19-CV-10927
Plaintiff:
Regan Phillips
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20 inclusive
Robert Flynn v. Ford Motor Company
as CAC/5:19-CV-02472
Plaintiff:
Robert Flynn and Daniel Canizales
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, City of South Gate and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Ladislao Zarate v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:19-CV-02475
Plaintiff:
Ladislao Zarate, Moorish Science Temple of America, Moorish Law Services and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Department of Children and Family Services, Los Angeles Police Department and others
Rose Rios et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:19-CV-10779
Plaintiff:
Rose Rios and Cruz Gallardo
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Douglas Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:19-CV-02453
Plaintiff:
Douglas Adams and Dana Adams
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive,
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Virginia Murguia v. Jacquelyn Hernandez et al
as 2:2019cv10531
Plaintiff:
Virginia Murguia
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Hernandez, Law Office of Craig A. Darling, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maribel Vasquez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:19-CV-10488
Plaintiff:
Maribel Vasquez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
