Cases 71 - 80 of 216
Hector Morales De La Cruz v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/8:20-CV-00376
Plaintiff:
Hector Morales De La Cruz
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Robert Bringhurst v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:20-CV-00345
Plaintiff:
Robert Bringhurst and The Bobys Company, LLC
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Haim David Assulin doing business as Mr. Build, David Assulin doing business as Mr. Build and others
Cirilo Martinez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:20-CV-01502
Plaintiff:
Cirilo Martinez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Sugey Guerrero v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/8:20-CV-00300
Plaintiff:
Sugey Guerrero and Michael Slosser
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Betty Johnson and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frankie v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:20-CV-00291
Plaintiff:
Frankie and Tammy Frankie
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Petitioner:
Eric F. Robinson
Respondent:
J. Pickett
Enrique Mota v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:20-CV-01430
Plaintiff:
Enrique Mota
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Laura Burnett v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:20-CV-01404
Plaintiff:
Laura Burnett
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Melvin Hanes v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/5:20-CV-00289
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hanes and Lillie Cottrell
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Lane Nakasone and others
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan et al
as 2:2019cv08177
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
Plaintiff:
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
