Cases 71 - 80 of 342
MAHONEY et al v. DEER VALLEY RESORT COMPANY, L.P. et al
as 2:2016mc00083
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. MAHONEY and ANNE W. MAHONEY
Defendant:
DEER VALLEY RESORT COMPANY, L.P. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Movant:
MARINER CHESTNUT PARTNERS, LP
Respondent:
A. GIBBS ASSOCIATES, P.C. and A. GIBBS ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Prukala v. Medicredit, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
Michael Prukala
Defendant:
Medicredit, Inc. , John Does 1-10 and Corporations X,Y,Z
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY v. REICHL et al
as 2:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Defendant:
FRANK A. REICHL , CHEMTRADE LOGISTICS INC. , CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT v. REICHL et al
as 2:2015cv06799
Plaintiff:
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
FRANK A. REICHL , GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INC., CHEMTRADE LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
