Other Statutes Cases filed in Texas
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,069
Horton v. Sunpath LTD
as 3:2022cv02130
Plaintiff: Lucas B Horton
Defendant: Sunpath LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02118
Defendant: Haoqiang Fu, Timothy Barton, Carnegie Development LLC and others
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent: Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America NA
Interested Party: HNGH Turtle Creek, Maximilien Barton, Gillespie Villas LLC and others
Receiver: Receiver
Intervenor: United States of America
Petitioner: Southern Properties Capital Ltd, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, First Development Company of Ohio LLC and others
Not Classified By Court: Texas Republic Bank, N.A. and ADR Provider
Horton v. SunPath Ltd
as 3:2022cv02111
Plaintiff: Lucas B Horton
Defendant: SunPath Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv03174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
v. Dell Technologies
as 4:2022mc01511
Respondent: Dell Technologies
Petitioner: Hyland Software Inc. and Hyland UK Operations Ltd
Peinado v. GQ SOLUTIONS LLC d/b/a VAC et al
as 3:2022cv00266
Plaintiff: Abraham Peinado
Defendant: GQ SOLUTIONS LLC d/b/a VAC and SUNPATH LTD
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ipsen Biopharm Ltd v. Galderma Laboratories LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00662
Plaintiff: Ipsen Biopharm Ltd. and Ipsen Biopharm Ltd
Defendant: Galderma Laboratories, L.P., Galderma Laboratories LP and Galderma Research & Development LLC
Munck Wilson Mandala LLP v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01657
Plaintiff: Munck Wilson Mandala, LLP and Munck Wilson Mandala LLP
Defendant: Mark D. Jordan, Scot Florsheim, Louann Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eni Ghana Exploration and Production ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022mc01285
Petitioner: Eni Ghana Exploration and Production ltd and Viitol Upstream Ghana Ltd
Respondent: Gaffney Cline & Associates, Inc and Baker Hughes Company
Intervenor: Springfield Exploration and Production Limited

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?