Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Stine v. Berkebile, et al
as 13-1498
Petitioner - Appellant: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent - Appellee: D. BERKEBILE, Warden, ADX, HEWITT, Case Manager, ADX and PATRICIA RANGEL, Unit Manager, ADX
Stine v. Berkebile et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv03097
Petitioner: Mikeal Glenn Stine
Respondent: David Berkebile, Hewitt and Patricia Rangel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
In re: Stine, et al
as 13-3257
Petitioner: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent: PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
BEY v. BUTZBAUGH et al
as 1:2013cv01494
Plaintiff: YUSUF RAHIM BEY
Defendant: ALFRED M. BUTZBAUGH, AUTHER J. COTTER, M. LOUISE STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as MSS/5:13-cv-00177
Defendant: Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Edna Stine
Stine v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22073
Plaintiff: Patricia Stine
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Stine v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13279
Plaintiff: Jean Stine
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
In re: Pinson, et al, et al
as 13-3143
Petitioner: In re: JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, CHARLES HIPPS and MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent: PAUL LAIRD, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
In re: Stine
as 13-1137
Petitioner: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, (Agency), MR. DAVID ALLRED, Clinical Dir. ADX, MR. BLAKE DAVIS, Warden ADX and others
In re: Stine
as 12-1449
Petitioner: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent: D. BERKEBILE, CHRISTOPHER WILSON, JON MATTHES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?