Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Abraham et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv02844
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Abraham, Keith Abraham, Yolanda Aguirre and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Lamar v. Astrue
as 3:2009mi00018
Plaintiff:
Wayne Tyrone Lamar
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Type:
Other Statutes
Embry v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv02582
Petitioner:
Bruce Wayne Embry
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Loren A. Grayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
First State Bank of Norwest Arkansas v. Ballistics Research, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
First State Bank of Northwest Arkansas and First State Bank of Northwest Arkansas
Defendant:
Ballistics Research, Inc. and Wayne F. Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Type:
Other Statutes
Wayne v. Chattman
as 1:2009cv02277
Petitioner:
Willie Mays Wayne
Respondent:
Bruce Chattman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.