Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Axinn et al v. The New York State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2014cv05709
Plaintiff:
Elwyn Andrade, Mark Axinn, Laurene Coffey and others
Defendant:
Jose Miguel Araujo, William T. Biamonte, Ronald Castorina, Jr. and others
Intervenor:
Attorney General of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Willey v. Prospect Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03796
Plaintiff:
Grant Willey
Defendant:
Prospect Capital Corporation, John F. Barry III and Brian H. Oswald
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conroy v. ADT L.L.C.
as 1:2014cv01252
Plaintiff:
Abraham Grant Conroy
Defendant:
ADT L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Franzone et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05282
Defendant:
NYC Police Officer Frankie (Frank) Alvarez, Bruno Salon and Spa, C. Elias Enterprise Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cavale Tonuzi Inc., Georgette Franzone, G. Lifestyle Spa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rossmann v. The Suffolk Times et al
as 2:2013cv03142
Defendant:
John Doe 2:13cv3142-1, John Doe 2:13cv3142-2, John Doe 2:13cv3142-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DeSuze et al v. Donovan et al
as 1:2013cv02093
Plaintiff:
Mary DeSuze, Louise Grant and Petra Montgomery
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan, Marc Jahr, Alan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
