Cases 81 - 90 of 10,422
Martinez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2590
Plaintiff:
ALEX MARTINEZ and LAURA YAZMIN LOPEZ LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Reyna, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2593
Plaintiff:
JENNIPHER REYNA and ADELA ALCALA LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Jayed, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2596
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM KADHIM JAYED and YURISELY IZAZAGA MALDONADO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Moreno Fraijo, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2598
Plaintiff:
JESUS RODOLFO MORENO FRAIJO and BLANCA LETICIA CHAVARIN
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Bravo, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2602
Plaintiff:
GLORIA DELIA BRAVO and DALILA RODRIGUEZ CUEVAS
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Thompson v. City of New York
as 24-1051
Plaintiff:
EON THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Mayor of New York City, CYNTHIA BRANN, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Correction and others
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent:
GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others
Brown v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2521
Plaintiff:
ALICE BROWN
Defendant:
Police Officer ETHAN MILLER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF DEL NORTE and others
Saad Khalid v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
Saad Bin Khalid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity, only, Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
