Cases 81 - 90 of 200
Ryan Gallagher v. Uttam Dhillon, et al
as 20-10518
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General, SUSAN GIBSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN GALLAGHER, Reverand Ryan "Sasha" Gallagher
Mark Adams v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 20-40360
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, MARK STAPLES, GREG TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK D. ADAMS
Texas Democratic Party, et al v. Greg Abbott, Governor of TX, et al
as 20-50407
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Chair of the Texas Democratic Party, JOSEPH DANIEL CASCINO, SHANDA MARIE SANSING and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KEN PAXTON, Texas Attorney General, RUTH HUGHS, Texas Secretary of State and GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
Amicus Curiae:
Tarrant County Republican Party, Disability Rights Advocates, Landmark Legal Foundation and others
Jarvis Dugas v. USA, et al
as 20-40329
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, DAVID J. BRADLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE HILDA G. TAGLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARVIS DUGAS
Planned Parenthood Center, et al v. Greg Abbott, Governor of TX, et al
as 20-50314
Defendant / Appellant:
PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
Glenn Fearn v. Timothy Graham, et al
as 20-10347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN WINNINGHAM FEARN
Defendant / Appellee:
V. NILSON, Euless Jailor, TIMOTHY C. GRAHAM, Euless Police, MICHAEL R. COLLINGWOOD, Euless Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
