Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gober v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv02523
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Gordon M. Bethune, Julius Genachowski and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gober
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 2:2018mc00210
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Lamar Adams and Madison Timber Properties, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Graham Ship by Truck Company
as 2:2016mc00225
Defendant:
Graham Ship by Truck Company
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Arthur H Bunte, Jr
In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation
as 2:2014md02591
Plaintiff:
Eagle-View Dairy, LLC, Michael D. Tiede, Frank Hagenmaier and others
Petitioner:
Law Offices of Michael Miller, PC, Call & Gentry Law Group, LLC, Gellhaus & Gellhaus, PC and others
Other:
Harry G. Barber, Jr. and Sharon Brunet
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Syngenta Crop Protection AG
Defendant:
Bunge North America, Inc.
Interested Party:
Nolan Law Group and Lowe Eklund Wakefield Co., LPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment, et al. v. Sprint Corporation et al.
as 2:2003cv02071
Defendant:
William T. Esrey , Ronald T. Lemay , Sprint Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
New Jersey State of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 5:2009mc00408
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital, LLC, Scoop Management, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Burton W. Wiand
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 6:2009mc00108
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital, LLC, Scoop Management, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
