Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Notarc Port Investment LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Defendant:
Notarc Port Investment LLC, Notarc Investment Partners LLC, Coastal Infrastructure Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Zhang et al
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Defendant:
Liang Zhang, Sinolam Consulting & Trading Holdings Pte. Ltd., Notarc Port Investment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Wilhelm v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Wheeler v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Waterman v. MTS Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00184
Defendant:
MTS Systems Corporation, Linda Zukauckas, Chun Hung Yu and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Shumacher v. MTS Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00094
Defendant:
MTS Systems Corporation, Linda Zukauckas, Chun Hung Yu and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
OI European Group B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela et al
as 1:2019cv00290
Defendant:
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, CITGO Holding, Inc., Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
OI European Group B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Muehlgay v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01622
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Julius Genachowski, Stephen Kappes and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Muehlgay
Klein v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01551
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Patrick Doyle, Julius Genachowski and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Klein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
