Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 190
USA v. Antony Vo
as 24-3050
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Antony Vo
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified: Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Snow, et al. v. Align Technology, Inc.
as 24-1783
Plaintiff: MISTY SNOW, DANA BOZIAN, EMILY VO and others
Defendant: ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Owda Darabuawad et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: Owda Darabuawad and All Thaer
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Secretary ALEJANDRO J. MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 4:2023cv03895
Plaintiff: BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant: C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House and others
Nguyen et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv03486
Plaintiff: My Phuong Nguyen and Quang Tran Duy Vo
Defendant: DHS Department of Homeland Security, USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court: In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Vo v. Broomfield
as 23-711
Petitioner: TIEN MINH VO
Respondent: RON BROOMFIELD
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff: BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant: Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House, Lisa A. Davis and others
Nominal Defendant: C3.ai, Inc.
Rafeal Newson v. Tony Evers, et al
as 23-1336
Petitioner: RAFEAL D. NEWSON
Respondent: TONY EVERS, Governor, ROBIN J. VOS, Speaker and JOSHUA L. KAUL, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?