Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. AEQUITAS MANAGEMENT et al
as 5:2016mc00003
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
AEQUITAS MANAGEMENT LLC, AEQUITAS HOLDINGS LLC, AEQUITAS COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Aequitas Management, LLC et al
as 4:2016mc00006
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Aequitas Management, LLC, Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC, Aequitas Capital Management Inc and others
Lopez v. City of Avondale Estates et al
as 1:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Antonia S. Lopez
Defendant:
City of Avondale Estates, Avondale Police Department, Jason Browen and others
Lopez v. City of Avondale Estates et al
as 1:2010mi00012
Plaintiff:
Antonia S. Lopez
Defendant:
City of Avondale Estates, Avondale Police Department, Jason Browen and others
Lopez v. Browen et al
as 1:2009cv03397
Plaintiff:
Antonia S. Lopez
Defendant:
Jason Browen, Paul Conroy and Thomas Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Lopez v. Browen et al
as 1:2009mi00469
Plaintiff:
Antonia S. Lopez
Defendant:
Jason Browen, Paul Conroy and Thomas Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Scott v. Progressive Mountain Insurance et al
as 1:2009cv02932
Plaintiff:
David A. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Progressive Mountain Insurance, James J. Gebolys, Michael Hensel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Scott v. Progressive Mountain Insurance et al
as 1:2009mi00404
Plaintiff:
David A. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Progressive Mountain Insurance, James J. Gebolys, Michael Hensel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
