Cases 1 - 10 of 24
BODYBIO, INC. v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2021cv15726
Plaintiff:
BODYBIO, INC.
Defendant:
Herbert Pierce, M.D. Krishna Doniparthi, HEMA PATEL-DONIPARTHI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv11191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
THOMAS v. MERRILL LYNCH et al
as 3:2021cv10362
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, JOHN LAHOUD, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
ANA J. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
THOMAS v. MERRILL LYNCH et al
as 2:2021cv10362
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, John Lahoud and PIERCE, FENNER SNITH MERRILL LYNCH
Plaintiff:
ANA J THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED v. SAKWA et al
as 2:2017cv11453
Defendant:
STEPHEN SAKWA, PAGE O'CONNOR, WILLIAM O'CONNOR and others
Plaintiff:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DWAYNE EDWARDS, TODD BARKER , SENIOR SOLUTIONS OF SOCIAL CIRCLE, LLC and others
Receiver:
DEREK PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
KAROON et al v. THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
LISA KAROON and MANICKAM GANESH
Defendant:
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. , MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC. , CREDIT SUISSE (USA), INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MOOREFIELD v. ENZYMOTEC LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv06075
Plaintiff:
DENNIS W. MOOREFIELD
Defendant:
ENZYMOTEC LTD. , ARIEL KATZ, OREN BRYAN and others
Movant:
3B COMMUNICATION G.E.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
WHITE v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. et al
as 3:2014cv05840
Petitioner:
RONALD WILLIAM WHITE
Respondent:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC. and CHRISTOPHER CHARLES DUMONT
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
