Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ROGERS v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04028
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS R. ROGERS
Defendant:
84 LUMBER COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE AUTO PARTS and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Cross_defendant:
84 LUMBER COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Hall v. 84 Lumber Company
as 2:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company
Hall v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 2:2010mc00012
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Vinal and Robert C. Vinal, Inc.
Movant:
HUB International Transportation Services, Inc. and John Light
Hall v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 2:2010mc00001
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Vinal and Robert C. Vinal, Inc.
Movant:
HUB International Transportation Services, Inc. and John Light
HALL v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY et al
as 1:2009mc00028
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D HALL, SR
Defendant:
84 LUMBER COMPANY, DARREN RICHARDSON and KEITH CONNER
BFI Waste Systems Of North America, L.L.C. v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv50060
Plaintiff:
BFI Waste Systems Of North America, L.L.C. and BFI Waste Systems Of North America, L.L.C.
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc., Temco Grinding Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey Lumber & Supply Co. et al v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv01394
Plaintiff:
Bailey Lumber & Supply Co. and 84 Lumber Company
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Bluelinx Corporation and Weyerhaeuser Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
