Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Perez-Arritola v. Plaza de Diego, S.E. et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Mr. David J Perez-Arritola and David J. Perez-Arritola
Defendant:
Plaza de Diego, S.E., Carlos L Garca-Muiz, Garca-Sol Conjugal Partnership and others
In Re: FINRA Arbitration 15-01455
as 3:2017mc00164
Claimant:
Omega Engineering, LLC, OESE Holding, Inc. and Grupo Desarrollador de Diego, Inc.
Respondent:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999
Federal Trade Commission v. BunZai Media Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2015mc00281
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
BunZai Media Group, Inc., Pinnacle Logistics, Inc., DSA Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Marrero-Rolon et al v. Autoridad de Energia Electrica et al
as 3:2015cv01167
Plaintiff:
Ismael Marrero-Rolon , Anne Catesby Jones , Jorge Valdes Llauger and others
Defendant:
Autoridad de Energia Electrica , William Rodney Clark , Edwin Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
United States of America et al v. Aveta, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01140
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Jose R Valdez
Defendant:
Aveta Inc. , MMM Healthcare, Inc. , MSO of Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
American Health Inc. et al v Chevere et al.
as 3:2012cv01678
Plaintiff:
American Health Inc. , Socios Mayores en Salud, Inc. and Socios Mayores en Salud Holding, Inc.
Defendant:
Sergio Chevere , Iraida Del-Rio and Conjugal Partnership Chevered-Del Rio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roman et al v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2012cv01663
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Roman , Ricardo Roman-Rivera and SDM Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. of Puerto Rico, UBS Trust Company of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund IV, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
