Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JAMAL et al v. ALLY FINANCIAL et al
as 2:2024cv00894
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL, ALLY, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AHMED JAMAL and REEM SUQI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DAVIS v. ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
as 1:2023cv22897
Plaintiff:
LETITIA DAVIS
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LOUIS-JEAN v. ALLY FINANCIAL
as 3:2022cv04435
Plaintiff:
LENSKY LOUIS-JEAN
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER v. HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2022cv01284
Petitioner:
JERSEY SHORE MEDICAL CENTER and JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Respondent:
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES and LOCAL 5058, HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ALLIED EMPLOYEES, AFT/AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KENT v. IREGUI et al
as 2:2021cv20691
Defendant:
RENATO IREGUI, RENATO ALESSANDRO IREGUI, RENATO ESCOBAR IREGUI and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv15960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
