Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wascher et al v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue et al
as 6:2018cv01588
Defendant:
Maia Pearson, State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Mary Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Wascher and Patricia B. Wascher
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Front Range Equine Rescue v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2016cv00149
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management and Interior Board of Land Appeals
Plaintiff:
Front Range Equine Rescue
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Nyuwa v. Field Office Director et al
as 3:2013cv01275
Respondent:
Administrative Appeals Office, Field Office Director, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Jeremy A. Nyuwa
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States Department of Interior, Interior Board of Land Appeals v. Bean
as 1:2013cv00294
Defendant:
Don Bean
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Interior, Interior Board of Land Appeals
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
