Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ARKEMA INC. v. CANTWELL
as 2:2017cv04612
Plaintiff:
ARKEMA INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM CANTWELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
CHEMTURA CORPORATION v. SOLVAY S.A. et al
as 2:2008cv05355
Plaintiff:
CHEMTURA CORPORATION
Defendant:
SOLVAY S.A., SOLVAY AMERICA, INC., SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BURG v. ROHM & HAAS CO et al
as 2:2008cv04162
Plaintiff:
LESLIE A BURG
Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS CO, ARKEMA, INC., FERRO CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ZEBROWSKI v. ROHM & HAAS COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv04161
Plaintiff:
CHUCK ZEBROWSKI
Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, ARKEMA, INC., FERRO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
MILLER v. ROHM & HAAS CO. et al
as 2:2008cv03701
Plaintiff:
BARTLEY C. MILLER
Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS CO., ARKEMA, INC., FERRO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
DEFREN v. ROHM & HAAS COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv03702
Plaintiff:
SHARON DEFREN
Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, ARKEMA, INC, FERRO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHEM-WAY CORPORATION v. ARKEMA S.A. et al
as 2:2007cv02938
Plaintiff:
CHEM-WAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
ARKEMA S.A., FMC CORPORATION, SOLVAY AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
HAWTHORNE v. ARKEMA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. HAWTHORNE, RICHARD B. HAWTHORNE, HAWTHORNE PAINTING and others
Defendant:
ARKEMA, INC., ARKEMA, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ACE CONCRETE v. ARKEMA INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00488
Plaintiff:
ACE CONCRETE, ACE CONCRETE and ACE CONCRETE
Defendant:
ARKEMA INC., ARKEMA S.A., SARTOMER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
