Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
NAACP v. Tindell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-60647
Plaintiff: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi NAACP, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP, Jackson NAACP and others
Defendant: Sean Tindell, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Public Safety, Bo Luckey, in his official capacity as Chief of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety Office of Capitol Police, Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and others
Thomas v. Reeves
as 21-60171
Defendant / Appellant: Michael Watson, Secretary of State of the State of Mississippi, all in the official capacities of their own offices and in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Election Commissioners, Tate Reeves, Governor of the State of Mississippi, all in the official capacities of their own offices and in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Election Commissioners and Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, all in the official capacities of their own offices and in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Election Commissioners
Plaintiff / Appellee: Joseph Thomas, Vernon Ayers and Melvin Lawson
In re: State of Mississippi
as 16-60610
Petitioner: In re: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent: ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
State of Mississippi v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., et al
as 15-90017
Plaintiff - Petitioner: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent: ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
State of Mississippi v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., et al
as 15-90011
Plaintiff - Petitioner: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent: ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
In re: State of Mississippi
as 15-60225
Petitioner: In re: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent: ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Google, Incorporated v. James Hood, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-60205
Plaintiff - Appellee: GOOGLE INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES M. HOOD, III, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, in his official capacity
Gordon Justice, Jr., et al v. Delbert Hosemann, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60754
Plaintiff - Appellee: GORDON VANCE JUSTICE, JR., SHARON BYNUM, MATTHEW JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant: DELBERT HOSEMANN, in his official capacity as Mississippi Secretary of State and JAMES M. HOOD, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Jim Hood, et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60686
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Appellee: JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. and others
Jim Hood, et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60687
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Appellee: JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?