Cases 1 - 10 of 35
In Re Subpoena to John Suzuki
as 8:2021mc00035
In Re:
John Suzuki and Subpoena to John Suzuki
Petitioner:
AMO Development, LLC, AMO Manufacturing USA, LLC, AMO Sales and Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
J&J Surgical Vision, Inc.
Respondent:
Alcon Vision, LLC, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and Alcon Research LLC
AMO Development, LLC et al v. Alcon Vision, LLC et al
as 8:2021mc00034
Petitioner:
AMO Development, LLC, AMO Manufacturing USA, LLC, AMO Sales and Service, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Alcon Vision LLC, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and Alcon Research LLC
Respondent:
Gautam Chaudhary
In Re:
In Re Subpoena to Gautam Chaudhary
Plaintiff:
J and J Surgical Vision, Inc.
Kober v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2020cv08336
Plaintiff:
Amos Kober
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc. and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jasmine Amos v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 2:2020cv09351
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Amos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR et al
as 2:2020cv01720
Defendant:
Sutter Urgent Care, Amazing Charts-EHR, Sutter Center for Psychiartry and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C. L. v. Del Amo Hospital Inc et al
as 8:2018cv00475
Defendant:
Del Amo Hospital Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
C. L.
Shirley Lindsay v. Miron Amos Karagozian et al
as 2:2018cv02266
Defendant:
Does, Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Miron Amos Karagozian and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Lindsay
Luis Villegas v. Del Amo Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00595
Defendant:
CM EBAR, LLC, Del Amo Associates, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Luis Villegas
Amos Jackson v. U.S. District Court
as 2:2018cv00325
Petitioner:
Amos Jackson
Respondent:
U.S. District Court
Amos Chasson v. Immigration and Custom Enforcement
as 2:2017cv05819
Petitioner:
Amos Chasson
Respondent:
Immigration and Custom Enforcement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
