Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Qian v. VinFast Auto Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv03956
Plaintiff:
Meng Qian
Defendant:
VinFast Auto Ltd., Thi Thu Thuy Le, Pham Nhat Vuong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Comeau v. VinFast Auto Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv02750
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Comeau
Defendant:
VinFast Auto Ltd., Le Thi Thu Thuy, Pham Nhat Vuong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Abuda et al v. Strongblock et al
as 1:2022cv10869
Plaintiff:
Eileen Advincula, Chukwuemeka Agiri, Daley Antoine and others
Defendant:
David C Moss, Brian Abramson, Corey J Lederer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nguyen v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06091
Plaintiff:
Michael Nguyen
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nguyen v. Translate Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07062
Plaintiff:
Hoai Nguyen
Defendant:
Translate Bio, Inc., Ronald C. Renaud, Jr., Owen Hughes and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
