Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jackson v. Apple et al
as 5:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Heaven Jackson
Defendant:
Apple, Verizon, Steak & Shake and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harrison v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02219
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC and Austin Whisman
Plaintiff:
Nicholas S. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. LSM Transport, LLC
as 1:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
LSM Transport, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
LSM Transport, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Allstate Produce, Hansen Fruit Company, LP and CPC International Apple Co.
Counter_claimant:
LSM Transport, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bump Babies, Inc. et al v. Baby the Bump, Inc. et al
as 5:2012mc00113
Plaintiff:
Bump Babies, Inc., Fund Babeez, LLC and Renae Plant
Defendant:
Baby the Bump, Inc., Apple and Eve Maternity, LLC and Velva Lyn Stricker
Bump Babies, Inc. et al v. Baby the Bump, Inc. et al
as 5:2011mc00056
Plaintiff:
Bump Babies, Inc., Fund Babeez, LLC and Renae Plant
Defendant:
Baby the Bump, Inc., Apple and Eve Maternity and Velva L. Stricker
New York Apple Sales, Inc. v. Niagara Foods, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
New York Apple Sales, Inc. and New York Apple Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Niagara Foods, Inc. and Barry Schneider
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Global Distributors of Produce, LLC v. Apple Jacks Produce et al
as 1:2009cv01080
Plaintiff:
Global Distributors of Produce, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Jacks Produce and John E Webber
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
