Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rasheena PhiniseeIn re: Rasheena Phinisee
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-1145
Respondent:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, PATRICIA HAYGOOD, RANDOLPH MATTHEWS and others
Petitioner:
In re: RASHEENA PHINISEE
In re: David Robinson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-2053
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BERLE M. SCHILLER
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID ROBINSON
In re: Wheeler Zamichieli
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-3232
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: WHEELER ZAMICHIELI
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER and LEGROME D. DAVIS
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 14-8064
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 14-8065
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
In re: Michael Piskanin, Jr., et al
as 11-4161
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JAMES B. MARTIN and THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR.
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER
In Re: Omini Onen William
as 09-4485
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: OMINI ONEN WILLIAMS, AKA Williams Omini Onen, AKA William Omini
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER
In Re: Lamar McCrory, et al
as 08-4242
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: LAMAR LAUREN MCCRORY
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
BERLE M. SCHILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.